[Bioconversion] Conserve -- Even the Air Force Wants to Cut Oil's Role
Mike Morin
mikemorin at earthlink.net
Tue Jun 19 00:26:20 CDT 2007
Advanced Wind Technologies?
It's Fascist Blowhards like you
that obfuscate and help ruin any chance
of putting forth and realizing the changes
necessary.
Workin' for peace and cooperation,
Mike Morin
----- Original Message -----
From: "Geoff Thomas" <wind at iig.com.au>
To: "Discussion of biological conversion to fuels and chemicals"
<bioconversion at listserv.repp.org>
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 9:57 PM
Subject: Re: [Bioconversion] Conserve -- Even the Air Force Wants to Cut
Oil's Role
> Hi all, ranting is fine, but it has to be correct ranting.
> In 2005, according to a study done by the Australian CSIRO. a conservative
> scientific research
> organisation, the human race managed to throw 8 billion tons of carbon
> dioxide into the
> atmosphere, 2 billion tons more than 1995, - seems pretty grim eh, but in
> context, the natural
> world, the world of the plant kingdom, cycles 100 billion tons between the
> atmosphere and the
> land vegetation.
> Every Year.
> Now this is the natural cycle, plants grow, taking carbon dioxide from the
> atmosphere, turning
> into cellulose erc, then die or lose leaves and that material falls on to
> the ground, breaks down
> into compost/mulch, is eventually eaten by worms or bacteria and the
> carbon dioxide returns to
> the atmosphere, 100 billion tons per year.
> By diverting some of that carbon through gasifiers, wood stoves, methane
> digesters, charcoal
> fuel cells, various fermentation techniques and others I may not know of
> in such a way as to save
> electricity generated by fossil fuels, we reduce that 8 billion tons while
> not significantly
> interfering with the natural cycle.
> Of course any re-newable energy generated also helps greatly ( for example
> the wind industry
> currently generates more than 1% of the worlds elctricity, and is
> expanding at 30% per year, - if
> you do the figures, cumulative 30%, in 15 years wind energy alone will be
> generating all the
> current world electricity requirement) as does conserving energy and
> avoiding usage such as
> wasting fossil fuels on trivia, - we need to make every front a winner!
> However the point is that there is 100 billion tons going up every year, a
> lot to work with, and
> much woody mass can be heated to give off it's flammable gases, used to
> provide energy, and the
> rest of that mass turned into charcoal which is far more effective than
> mulch or compost at
> helping plants grow, and that charcoal will last at least 7000 years in
> the soil, - compost in
> the soil here in far north Queensland lasts a year if you are lucky.
> With the help of nature and our creative faculties we have the tools to
> turn around global
> warming and indeed even claw back out of the atmosphere the extra 240
> billion tons currently
> "surplus to requirements' we might say.
> 100 bilion tons is a hell of a weapon, 6.5 billion aware and caring human
> beings is a hell of a
> weapon wielder, that is all we need.
> Cheers,
> Geoff Thomas.
> Advanced Wind Technologies.
> Australia
>
>> G'day All,
>>
>> Biomass can't replace existing energy use (well, not with growing food
>> as well, let alone conservation of forests etc!) so how is it going to
>> provide the extra energy needed for all these conversions?
>>
>> Any conversion of energy is inefficient, so wastes our precious
>> bioenergy - we just have to think of things other than driving cars
>> everywhere, let alone flying! We have been far too inefficient with past
>> "conversions" and wasted too much fossil fuel on trivia.
>>
>> Gaseous fuels are best suited to stationary applications and any liquid
>> fuel will be needed for "emergency" uses.
>>
>> I think that's enough ranting for now,
>> HOOROO
>>
>> Dick Glick wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello --
>>>
>>> It's time for renewable natural gas produced from biomass -- it can't be
>>> done inexpensively --
>>> that is to convert methane to diesel fuel for planes and vehicles, but
>>> the technology is long
>>> known -- the German's used a version of the technology -- first in WW I
>>> than WW II -- to
>>> produce liquid fuels -- from coal.
>>>
>> SNIP
>> --
>> Mr. Paul Harris
>> Room G8, Leske Building
>> Faculty of Sciences,
>> The University of Adelaide, Roseworthy Campus, AUSTRALIA 5371
>> Ph : +61 8 8303 7880
>> Fax : +61 8 8303 7979
>> mailto:paul.harris at adelaide.edu.au
>> I now use "MailGuard" - if you do not get a reply please make contact
>> again (by fax?)
>> http://www.adelaide.edu.au/directory/paul.harris
>> Member IOBB http://www.iobbnet.org/drupal/
>>
>> CRICOS Provider Number 00123M
>> -----------------------------------------------------------
>> This email message is intended only for the addressee(s)
>> and contains information that may be confidential and/or
>> copyright. If you are not the intended recipient please
>> notify the sender by reply email and immediately delete
>> this email. Use, disclosure or reproduction of this email
>> by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is strictly
>> prohibited. No representation is made that this email or
>> any attachments are free of viruses. Virus scanning is
>> recommended and is the responsibility of the recipient.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bioconversion mailing list
>> Bioconversion at listserv.repp.org
>> http://listserv.repp.org/mailman/listinfo/bioconversion_listserv.repp.org
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bioconversion mailing list
> Bioconversion at listserv.repp.org
> http://listserv.repp.org/mailman/listinfo/bioconversion_listserv.repp.org
>
More information about the Bioconversion
mailing list