[Gasification] ..back to defining gasification, was: cold/hot gas efficiency

[Jigme Rangdrol]

Why should it require combustibility?

Arnt Karlsen wrote:

>On Wed, 10 May 2006 08:21:50 +0200, astrupgaard wrote in message 
><20060510062143.TXLR21582.fep45.mail.dk at ag17276f29bb5e>:
>
>  
>
>>- and that is why a gasifier definition should never include a demand
>>for cooling of the gas! (Apparently that is the case in Californian
>>legislation)
>>    
>>
>
>..it should however require combustibility of the product gas in air,
>say under standard athmosphaeric conditions like under standard 
>aviation conditions such as under the ICAO/ FAA standards, 
>15C/60F, 1013.25mb/760mmHg etc, which _any_ viable gasifier 
>can be set up to produce. 
>
>  
>