[Gasification] ..back to defining gasification, was: cold/hot gas efficiency

[Arnt Karlsen]

On Wed, 10 May 2006 10:30:31 -0700, Jigme wrote in message 
<44622337.8060903 at turboisp.com>:

> Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> 
> >On Wed, 10 May 2006 08:21:50 +0200, astrupgaard wrote in message 
> ><20060510062143.TXLR21582.fep45.mail.dk at ag17276f29bb5e>:
> >
> >  
> >
> > >- and that is why a gasifier definition should never include a
> > demand >for cooling of the gas! (Apparently that is the case in
> > Californian >legislation)
> >>    
> >>
> >
> > ..it should however require combustibility of the product gas in
> > air, say under standard athmosphaeric conditions like under standard
> >  aviation conditions such as under the ICAO/ FAA standards, 
> > 15C/60F, 1013.25mb/760mmHg etc, which _any_ viable gasifier 
> > can be set up to produce. 
> 
> Why should it require combustibility?

.."helps" legislators distinguish us from the incinerator people.

-- 
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;o)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
  Scenarios always come in sets of three: 
  best case, worst case, and just in case.