[Gasification] Torrified woodchips as a gasifier fuel
Max Kennedy
vacuum1313 at yahoo.ca
Fri Aug 3 20:42:27 EDT 2007
I wasn't quoting reports though I am in the process of finding same. It is simply logic that a less processed fuel has a lower "environmental cost". My background is environmental toxicology prior to teaching and much of the work I did was the remediation of groundwater sources contaminated mos often by petroleum or petroleum derivatives so the "logic" isn't completely without basis but comes from many years of working with the cleanup of contaminated soils around gas stations, refineries etc. I have worked as a member of multidimensional teams that have addressed soil, water and air contamination so have knowledge of air pollution as well. As a side note my researches to answer your question, a very valid one too, have indicated costs I had not taken into consideration such as increased health care costs in the vicinity of refineries, ecosystem losses such as found in the strip mining methodologies of the Athabasca Tar Sands project, fisheries
losses due to water contamination etc etc.. As yet I have found nothing similar for the production of vegetable oil. I will continue to research these embedded or embodied costs/pollution and comment as I find pertinant info.
Max
----- Original Message ----
From: Rolf Uhle <energiesnaturals at gmx.de>
To: Discussion of biomass pyrolysis and gasification <gasification at listserv.repp.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 2, 2007 3:07:03 AM
Subject: Re: [Gasification] Torrified woodchips as a gasifier fuel
Max,
I don´t know tto which reports on pollution created by wvo or svo you refer.
There was a kind of campaign in german media some time ago, but the tests
they made were in totally unprepared vehicles and much contested.
Do you have any trustworthy analisis/data ?
I would apreciate them.
Tanks
Rolf
----- Original Message -----
From: "Max Kennedy" <vacuum1313 at yahoo.ca>
To: "Discussion of biomass pyrolysis and gasification"
<gasification at listserv.repp.org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 5:32 AM
Subject: Re: [Gasification] Torrified woodchips as a gasifier fuel
> "Straight veggie oil is much, much more polluting than fossil diesel
> fuel, but biodiesel is a good bit less polluting than fossil diesel."
>
> If one only looks at comparing the 3 fuels themselves, this is true.
> However if one takes into account the imbedded energy/pollution of each in
> addition to that produced by using the end product then the WVO is far
> less costly both in energy costs and in total pollution produced. For
> example diesel has to have added the extraction costs, the environmental
> impact costs (such as the Vancouver pipeline rupture), the refining energy
> costs etc. The biodiesel has to include the energy/pollution in the
> process and process chemicals such as methanol and sodium hydroxide as
> well as disposal of the glycerine etc. Yes, WVO has imbedded costs for
> processing, transport etc but they are lower as the material is far less
> processed and the costs are shared with the food industry as that was the
> primary use of the WVO. An example of re-use advantage. This last
> consideration is not true of diesel and partially true of biodiesel
> depending on the ratio of WVO in the
> BD. The end use only mindset, which the starting quote embodies, needs to
> be replaced with a total cycle cost mindset. That is not to say those on
> the list aren't aware these "hidden" costs exist however it is to say that
> the language we choose to use influences the thinking processes both of
> ourselves and those we talk to. Just because some of the pollution to
> produce the more refined BD doesn't come from our tailpipe, originating
> from the methanol plant or the production of NaOH instead, doesn't mean
> that the pollution doesn't exist and isn't harmful.
>
> Off the soap box.
>
> The idea of trapping the waste carbon and using the waste heat from a WVO
> powered diesel using biomass destined for gasification sounds excellent to
> me and is a great example of whole cycle thinking that will truely
> overcome todays challenges in the future.
>
> Max K
>
>
> Be smarter than spam. See how smart SpamGuard is at giving junk email
> the boot with the All-new Yahoo! Mail at
> http://mrd.mail.yahoo.com/try_beta?.intl=ca
> _______________________________________________
> Gasification mailing list
> Gasification at listserv.repp.org
> http://listserv.repp.org/mailman/listinfo/gasification_listserv.repp.org
> http://gasifiers.bioenergylists.org
> http://info.bioenergylists.org
_______________________________________________
Gasification mailing list
Gasification at listserv.repp.org
http://listserv.repp.org/mailman/listinfo/gasification_listserv.repp.org
http://gasifiers.bioenergylists.org
http://info.bioenergylists.org
Be smarter than spam. See how smart SpamGuard is at giving junk email the boot with the All-new Yahoo! Mail at http://mrd.mail.yahoo.com/try_beta?.intl=ca
More information about the Gasification
mailing list