[Gasification] restored WWII motorcycle gasifier similar to chinese gassifier

Peter Singfield snkm at btl.net
Thu Feb 1 20:05:34 CST 2007


Wow!!

Quite the deal indeed -- 

It is about half the size of the Chinese gasifier -- and probably a lot
lighter!!

Peter / Belize


At 11:15 AM 2/1/2007 -0800, drew wrote:
>http://gasifiers.bioenergylists.org/files/100_3407%20%20wood%20gas%20motorc
ycle.jpg
>
>
>Here is the link to the higher res jpg.    This one you should be able 
>to read, the thumbnail on the web is not readable.    The whole article 
>is only 1 page but the user seems to have put quite a few miles on it, 
>using it's sidecar to store fuel....      The similarity to me is in the 
>overall size and shape.   The internal dimensions are hard to judge, but 
>the fact that no throat is visible and no heat marks are obvious would 
>lead me to believe that it is lined like the Chinese version with a 
>refractory material.    The filter/cooler unit looks very flashy, I 
>wonder if it is original?    My grandfather rode bikes similar to this 
>one (gasoline ver), and he said they ran around 12hp,  so if that were 
>down rated for wood gas that would be 8hp?    That sounds very close to 
>the right output for your small diesel engine experiments.   One of the 
>critical issues seems to be the size and shape of the reduction tube.   
>The FAO documents seem to say that the reduction tube should never be 
>smaller diameter than about 2", which seems about the same as the 
>Chinese version, the tricky thing is that it seems to me that the 
>Chinese version's reduction tube is very short?  the FAO docs seem to 
>call for much longer?    This guy is running his on hardwood, not 
>charcoal as I stated earlier.
>
>All the best
>Drew
>
>-- 
>This message is intended only for the addressee(s)and may contain
information that is confidential and/or copyright.  If you are not the
intended recipient please notify me by reply email and immediately delete
this email. Use, disclosure or reproduction of this email by anyone other
than the intended recipient(s) is strictly prohibited.
>
>
>
>



More information about the Gasification mailing list