[Gasification] Nukes - OT

[John G. Flottvik]

Dear Tom

Please remove me from this Nuke list.

Thanks

John

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Peter Singfield" <snkm at btl.net>
To: <gasification at listserv.repp.org>
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 9:22 AM
Subject: Re: [Gasification] Nukes - OT


>
> And -- as in not "officially" proven -- not meaning many deaths have
> resulted. Just not officially recorded and proven.
>
> In God we trust -- in modern world mass media driven government -- maybe 
> not??
>
> However -- fair is fair -- the deaths resulting from coal burning power
> plant emissions is probably astronomical??
>
> Also -- go beyond just human life -- consider the entire life ecology of
> earth???
>
> If we survive but little else does -- we still end up doomed -- right??
>
> Remember "acid-rains"
>
> Remember that residual amounts of uranium are always found in coal 
> deposits
> and that ends up where???
>
> There is a huge gray area here!
>
> Again -- "conservation" is the only true -- viable -- answer -- and can be
> quickly achieved by doubling the price of gasoline in the US to $6.00 per
> gallon -- by taxations.
>
> Electric energy rates should be triples at least -- by the same route.
>
> This would achieve two ends that would solve the problem in very short 
> order.
>
> 1: A great reduction in energy consumption would result -- immediatly!!
>
> 2: The US government might even break even for a change in it's 
> finances --
> thus avoiding a global economic meltdown.
>
> Course -- it would mean Americans would have to stop being knee jerking
> energy pigs -- and according to Cheney - -that is not negotiable.
>
> To bad -- there goes our planet!!
>
> There are real solutions -- but there is no real will among people in deep
> denial to do anything -- never mind anything "real"!!
>
> So we all go to hell -- but America is not the "EVIL" nation.
>
> Excuse me -- but please do something about your bad breath -- eh??
>
> Peter/Belize
>
> At 11:43 AM 5/1/2007 -0600, Mike Weaver wrote:
>>I noticed the span left out 1945, and geological range left out Japan.
>>
>>Why doesn't Chernobyl count?
>>
>>
>>Bob Stuart wrote:
>>
>>>On 1-May-07, at 9:27 AM, Jonathan Pratt wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>And not a single nuclear related incident in 40 years in both the
>>>>US and
>>>>France, nor anywhere else but Russia that has resulted in loss of a
>>>>single
>>>>life.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>Oh?  Just google on "Uranium Mining Death"  Prospectors often find
>>>minerals deep underground by noticing a distinctive discolouration on
>>>certain leaves.  The sign for Uranium is genetic deformations.  I'm
>>>sure that the statistics will show deaths away from the mines as
>>>well, and if some are dying, many are damaged, as are their children.
>>>
>>>Best,
>>>Bob Stuart
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Gasification mailing list
>>>Gasification at listserv.repp.org
>>>http://listserv.repp.org/mailman/listinfo/gasification_listserv.repp.org
>>>http://gasifiers.bioenergylists.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Gasification mailing list
>>Gasification at listserv.repp.org
>>http://listserv.repp.org/mailman/listinfo/gasification_listserv.repp.org
>>http://gasifiers.bioenergylists.org
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gasification mailing list
> Gasification at listserv.repp.org
> http://listserv.repp.org/mailman/listinfo/gasification_listserv.repp.org
> http://gasifiers.bioenergylists.org
>