[Gasification] CO2 aka more global warming

[David G. LeVine]

At 08:04 PM 10/10/2007, gfwhell at aol.com wrote:
>I will adjust my stance on this, when someone can tell me who 
>financed the research, what was the researchers expertise.and what 
>alternative explanations are given.

If I fund a study of the relationship of cancer and asbestos dust 
inhalation and a causal relationship is found and no other studies 
are done, does that remove the possibilities of other causes?  Quite 
obviously no.

If a group with an agenda funds a study with narrowly specified 
goals, does that make the study invalid?  No, but it does make the 
study of limited value.

If a study of Thalidomide were made on only 20 to 60 year old men in 
otherwise good health, no birth defects would be found, but it does 
not mean that the same study with no gender discrimination would not 
show any, nor would it show defects if the study was 6 months 
long.  After all, it requires a willingness to look at defects as a 
result of the dosing of Thalidomide.

What some here are saying is that the breakdown products of R-12 do 
have an effect on ozone, but the ozone hole may be caused by more 
than those products.

If a study is commissioned of hammers and screws, findings could 
include one that screws can be successfully driven into wood by a 
hammer.  Does that invalidate a screwdriver?

David G. LeVine
Nashua, NH  03060