[Gasification] YouTube - Is this Fraud??

[Katahdin Energy Works]

The six point spread between Hillary and Obama in towns that did manual
counts and those that did machine counts is just amazing. 

The pollsters' predictions were spot on in the manual count towns; while
there are serious allegations about the criminal background of the
sales/marketing director for JHC--the company which maintains the Diebold
voting machines.

I'm not saying there was programming algorithm(AL GORE RYTHM?) that shaved
votes from Hillary's challengers in the computer towns and added them to her
totals; but there are not logical or consistent explanations for the six
point difference.  Could be a small vs. large town difference; but sub
tallies don't match with voter preference demographics either. 

VOTING FRAUD is way off topic; but then this only fuels distrust of all
technology!

   
Frank J. Heller, MPA
KATAHDIN ENERGY WORKS
12 Belmont St.
Brunswick, ME 04011-3004
207.729.6090
http://mysite.verizon.net/fjheller/

-----Original Message-----
From: gasification-bounces at listserv.repp.org
[mailto:gasification-bounces at listserv.repp.org] On Behalf Of Kevin Chisholm
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 2:42 PM
To: Discussion of biomass pyrolysis and gasification
Subject: Re: [Gasification] YouTube - Is this Fraud??

Dear Kenn and Bob

The Voting Machine Computers are not broken.

They are fixed. :-)