[Gasification] Corrupt government, conspiracy, new world order, no future.

[Kenn Johnsen]

Den 03/03/2008 kl. 14.49 skrev MMBTUPR at aol.com:

>                from          Lewis L Smith
>
> Oil undoubtedly has multiple origens, althouh most of it seems to be  
> of vegetable origin. However, nothing I said depends on the matter  
> of origin, nor do any of the peak oil projections which I have read.

What I understand from the establishment is that oil is not  
renewable.....it is biotic. I can not remember that I have heard  
anything else.
>
>
> Reserve data is extremely unreliable. For example, at least through  
> most of 2007, Kuwait's reserves were exaggerated by 100%. And for  
> years, Oil & Gas Journal  has published unchanged reserve figures  
> for some 70 countries. The odds that annual additions to reserves  
> would exactly equal withdrawals for so many countries for so many  
> years is practically zero. Something is obviously fishy here.


Absolutely, completely unreliable....they do not include oil shale.


>
>
> In addition, it is far more important to estimate what people are  
> going to be able to
> extract from active and prospective reservoirs within the foreseable  
> future, than to estimate the total number of barrels which might be  
> extracted over the lifetime of these same reservoirs, mostly at  
> declining rates of production.
>
> Fortunately there are various ways of projecting the production from  
> an active reservoir without recourse to estimates of reserves. And  
> because of the time lags involving in mapping, exploring and  
> developing fields, it is possible to make a rough estimate most of  
> the oil that is going to be discovered in the next decade. And on  
> the basis of past experience, it is also possible to estimate  
> [ albeit with less accuracy ] the amount of oil which will be  
> obtained from projects not yet announced but likely to be undertaken  
> in the next decade or so.
>
> Again I would point out that neither reserve nor production  
> statistics take into account the energy which is used to put a  
> marketable product in a tank on the surface, which nowadays is a  
> significant number, especially in the cases of old or unconventional  
> reservoirs.
>
> The most uncertain element in a projection of future oil production  
> is the technological breakthroughs which might be achieved in the  
> future, to lower the cost of and increase the probability of finding  
> oil in a given location. However, these are also activities with  
> long lead times. And at present there is nothing in the pipeline  
> that offers the promise of gains equivalent to those achieved in  
> recent decades by >>>
>
> [1]     The switch from 2-D to 3-D interpretation of seismic data.
>
> [2]     The "bundle" of technologies used to bring in Jack 2 in the  
> Gulf of Mexico at 6,000 BCD, in 5,000 feet of water to a total depth  
> of 32,000 feet.
>
> In brief, a more civil mode of discourse and a little caution on  
> your part would seem advisable.


Well, what do you say to to the people there say, the world is going  
under in 1987........well it did not happen.......but 1997......it did  
not happening either.....but it will in 2020.......rubbish.
>
>
> Please do not communicate with me further.


Right, your brainwashed government people are impossible to  
communicate with.
>
>
> Sincerely.  ###
>
>
> **************
> Ideas to please picky eaters. Watch video on AOL Living.
> (http://living.aol.com/video/how-to-please-your-picky-eater/rachel-campos-duffy/2050827?NCID=aolcmp00300000002598 
> )