[Greenbuilding] [BULK] Re: [BULK] Re: Cellulose settling/blowing

Lawrence Lile LLile at projsolco.com
Thu Jul 27 21:30:41 CDT 2006 

Thanks, Kieth
 
Good points - this is on a 4:12 and in another area on a 6:12 pitch.  It is a worry that if it is loose filled the peak may settle.  There was an idea kicked around to put that insulation screen stuff across the top chord of the truss, leaving a 6" air gap above 18" insulation (it is a 24" truss) sounds real doable, and would allow dense packing.  18" in the roof would be at least R 60, that ought to be enough for any Alaskan.  It might do for a Missourian like me too.  
 
 

________________________________

From: greenbuilding-bounces at listserv.repp.org on behalf of Keith Winston
Sent: Thu 7/27/2006 7:19 PM
To: Greenbuilder list
Subject: [BULK] Re: [Greenbuilding] [BULK] Re: Cellulose settling/blowing



Lawrence (no, I'm not George, sorry),

I don't understand: are you trying to loose-fill a cathedral ceiling?
What keeps the cellulose from just tumbling down into a big pile, and
leaving the peak uninsulated? I must be missing something. What pitch
cathedral?

Keith


Lawrence Lile wrote:
> George,
>
> Wow, you've been around a bag of cellulose a few times!
>
> Here is an installation problem:  I have a cathedral ceiling, 24" deep
> roof truses, and ventilation planned for above the insulation layer.  My
> installer proposes to have the sheetrock installed except for a 12" gap
> at one end of the ceiling, and cover that with a net, then blow
> cellulose into the space from one end.  I'd like to have about 14" of
> cellulose when I am done. Does that sound reasonable? So you can't dense
> pack it, because the space is too deep.  It is bound to settle, because
> it isn't dense packed.  How will they know if they are applying the
> right depth of insulation? 
>
> --Lawrence
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: greenbuilding-bounces at listserv.repp.org
> [mailto:greenbuilding-bounces at listserv.repp.org] On Behalf Of George J.
> Nesbitt
> Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 1:59 PM
> To: Greenbuilder list; George J. Nesbitt
> Subject: [BULK] Re: [Greenbuilding] Cellulose settling/blowing
> Importance: Low
>
> So as a "Professional" installer of cellulose I have the following to
> say about cellulose settling.
>
> If you look at a bag of loose fill insulation (Cocoon) for attic
> installation you would blow it in at 1.4 lbs/cuft density to a depth of
> 12" to achieve R-40, and it would settle out to 10.8". Settling is not
> an issue for attic insulation as long as your final thickness is the
> minimum (otherwise you blew it at too low of density and didn't achieve
> your R-value).
>
> For wall installation you install it at 2.6 lbs/cuft, R-13 with 2x4,
> R-19 with 2x6 (retrofit Cocoon dry pack installation). If you follow the
> manufactures specifications for walls you will get settling. Typically
> (hopefully) this is installed using 1-1/2" holes not more that 4' apart
> (vertically) in every stud bay, and the nosel is stuck into the hole and
> the wall is filled. You might not get around every obstruction and the
> density will be greatest near the hole. I have opened walls (on my
> parents house that I had filled by a subcontractor 10 years before) and
> found a large gap at the tops of the stud bays (holes at bottom of wall)
> either from settling, or not fully filled. When you have a gap in
> insulation it has an effect far greater than its area. So a 1 or 2% gap
> reduced the insulation value 15% or so.
>
> There are two reasons for dense pack cellulose, 1st is to eliminate
> settings, 2nd to reduce air infiltration. Dense pack requires that you
> install at 3.5 lbs/cuft or greater density (I have read that 3.2 is ok,
> but probably about the minimum). Because some of the fibers in cellulose
> are very fine, it fills some of the holes in the walls. When you do a
> blower door test to measure the air leakage in a building before and
> after retrofitting walls with cellulose you will see a measurable
> reduction in air leakage (even at lower densities). If you blow in
> fiberglass you will not see a difference. So how do you install dense
> pack cellulose? you use a bigger hole, 2 to 2-1/2", one per stud bay,
> you insert a 1 or 1-1/4" interior diameter stiff vinyl hose up the wall
> (drilling from the bottom seems to be the best method) and fill the wall
> removing the tube slowly to prevent clogging the hose.The equipment you
> get from Home Depot, or Lowes, or a rental yard is typically not
> powerful enough to get this density. I have a 20yr old Force 2 blower (I
> got it free, $5000 new), but I am only able to get up to 3.2 lbs with
> this method (I don't use a vinyl hose yet, might help), it only has one
> blower, a machine with 2 blowers is probably the minimum. Don't assume
> you installer is doing dense pack, I don't know anybody in my area that
> does it other than me.
>
> Cocoon 2 Stabilized Borate Formula for wet spray installs at 2.6
> lbs/cuft, but because of the glues settling is not an issue as far as I
> know. If you add to much water it doesn't fill around obstructions as
> well. I just learned that the glue is either gar gum or wheat, I have
> problems with gluten (contained in most grains) and need to find a
> supplier of borate only, no glue cellulose insulation.
>
> I haven't done any blow in batt (netting) jobs, but I suspect that you
> can't blow it dense pack without blowing out the netting, or interfering
> with Sheetrock unless you strap the walls. An alternative method is to
> hang the rock and dry blow dense pack after, but before finishing taping
> and mudding, if you want to avoid wet spray.
>
> I have herd good things about Johns Manville Spider spray in fiberglass,
> formaldehyde free, although it probable has an acrylic binder.
>
> The problem with batts is they are typically installed poorly. Gaps top
> and or bottom, compressed in width, don't fill the depth of the cavity
> fully, gaps because not cut around electrical wiring, plumbing,
> blocking, kraft faced batts create a gap at the Sheetrock that allows
> convection currents (even if you face staple and don't inset staple so
> the sheetrocker can find the studs).
>
> You will almost always get better quality from a blow job than from
> batts, even if you get some setting on average it might be better than
> the average batt job. The best batt job is still 10% worse than a spray
> blow in job.
>
>
>
> Keith Winston wrote:
>
>  
>> Hi  Jefro,
>>
>> Many, if not most, cellulose suppliers will supply, often for free, a
>> blower when you buy a lot of cellulose. Beware: the cellulose to fill
>> your entire 9.25" wall for an entire house will be a LOT of cellulose.
>> You should look to get it delivered. In which case you might have to
>> rent the blower separately. Which may not be a bad idea, since the
>> rentals are sometimes better units.
>>
>> Lowes often sell cellulose around here (Home Depot doesn't), and
>> they'll give you a cheap rattly little blower. BUT: at one of their
>> stores, they have a trailer they'll rent you for $40/day, with a REAL
>> blower in it (and enough room for a fair bit of insulation, but still
>> only 1/10 of your whole house, probably). You have to make sure you can
>>    
>
>  
>> park the trailer close enough that the hoses will reach everywhere you
>> need to get to. Otherwise, most freebies and rental units are portable,
>>    
>
>  
>> and can be rolled into position (some are heavy, mine is around 200 lbs
>>    
> I think).
>  
>> A medium-sized house might take a 40' trailer of cellulose. Have at
>> least 2-3 assistants for blowing, it'll go easier. You probably won't
>> have a recycler (a big vacuum) so someone will be hauling bags of
>> overblow back out to the truck/blower regularly.
>>
>> Keith
>>
>> Jefro wrote:
>> 
>>
>>    
>>> Does "DIY cellulose" mean renting a blower and installing cellulose
>>> into cavities on one's own?  I didn't know that was a possibility.
>>>
>>> We are building a home this fall using cellulose inside a 9-inch
>>> cavity built from a 2x10 plate and a double 2x4 wall.  We have been
>>> planning to find an installer to use wet-blown cellulose.  I am very
>>> interested to hear about other options, although I do have concerns
>>>      
> about settling.
>  
>>> Please continue to discuss!
>>>
>>> thanks
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Greenbuilding email list
>>> List info:
>>> http://listserv.repp.org/mailman/listinfo/greenbuilding_listserv.repp.
>>> org List email: Greenbuilding at listserv.repp.org Managed by
>>> BuildingGreen, Inc. http://www.buildinggreen.com
>>>      publisher of Environmental Building News and GreenSpec(r) Hosted
>>>      
>
>  
>>> and archived by REPP / CREST http://www.crest.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 
>>>   
>>>
>>>      
>> 
>>
>>    
>
> _______________________________________________
> Greenbuilding email list
> List info: http://listserv.repp.org/mailman/listinfo/greenbuilding_listserv.repp.org
> List email: Greenbuilding at listserv.repp.org
> Managed by BuildingGreen, Inc. http://www.buildinggreen.com
>       publisher of Environmental Building News and GreenSpec(r)
> Hosted and archived by REPP / CREST http://www.crest.org
>
>
>
>
>  

--
Keith Winston
Earth Sun Energy Systems
3927 Madison St.
Hyattsville, MD 20781
301-980-6325
keith at earthsunenergy.com
www.EarthSunEnergy.com



_______________________________________________
Greenbuilding email list
List info: http://listserv.repp.org/mailman/listinfo/greenbuilding_listserv.repp.org
List email: Greenbuilding at listserv.repp.org
Managed by BuildingGreen, Inc. http://www.buildinggreen.com
      publisher of Environmental Building News and GreenSpec(r)
Hosted and archived by REPP / CREST http://www.crest.org

More information about the Greenbuilding mailing list