[Greenbuilding] bio fuels and ethanol
Rob Tom
ArchiLogic at yahoo.ca
Wed Apr 11 14:06:07 CDT 2007
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 19:39:14 -0400, Tim Vireo Keating
<t.keating at rainforestrelief.org> wrote:
>> --- Ross MacLeod <drossmacleod at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> So, while ethanol
>>> from corn doesn't make sense, switch grass in
>>> addition to energy from waste
>>> most likely does.
Speaking from the idiocy corner here, about energy from waste...
Here in Ottawa there is a highly visible landfill mountain that many
people sneeringly refer to as "Mount Trashmore" (as if they had no role in
its creation) and whose operators had applied for a permit to increase its
capacity.
The primary objectors to the application are people who bought homes in
new subdivisions that were created near the pre-existing landfill
operation. I see it as akin to the situation of people buying properties
in the country and then complaining about the noise,dust and smells from
the adjacent farms.
As far as landfills go, I think that it is a wonderful operation in that
they have implemented a number of enviro-friendly innovations and its
highly visible location (almost immediately across the main cross-town
traffic artery from the NHL hockey arena) is a useful reminder as to how
much waste the community generates. I don't have a problem with it's
continued operation or expansion.
Many of the anti-dump expansion crowd want to see an energy-from-waste
facility created instead.
To that end, a home-grown company is going to build a plasma gasification
pilot project
http://www.plascoenergygroup.com
which is supposedly an improvement over waste incinerators but as yet,
I've not been able to find any figures on the net energy equation (yes I
have contacted the company).
As you may have gathered, I'm not convinced that energy-from-waste is a
good solution or even that it's a better solution than landfills. I see
landfills as low-energy re-source-itariums to temporarily store materials
that can be "mined" at a later date.
And although I will confess that I've been feeding my vehicles
corn-derived fuel for the past decade-and-a-half ( but I have driven less
than 6,000 kms per year over that time), I agree that it makes little
sense to take food crops like corn and soybeans to make petro-fuel
substitutes, from an energy-in-energy-out perspective since IIRC it takes
something like 3 units of energy (usually petro-derived) to produce one
unit of corn or soy derived energy.
The bio-fuels that make sense to me are those that are fed to bi-peds so
that they may pedal or peramubulate to wherever it is they think they need
to go.
--
=== * ===
Rob Tom
Kanata, Ontario, Canada
<A r c h i L o g i c at c h a f f y a h o o dot c a >
winnow the chaff from my edress in your reply
More information about the Greenbuilding
mailing list