[Greenbuilding] What R-2000 is not (was re: please rant

[David Delaney]

At 08:05 AM 14/04/2007, Nick Pine wrote:
>David writes:
>>
>> It's hard to make any sense of 160W/m^2-yr.
>
>How about 160 W/m^2?

Which is, as you well know, the same as my 160 W.yr/(m^2.yr). I was just trying to preserve 
all of the symbols of the original.  Also, when you write it as 160 W.yr/(m^2.yr) 
it eliminates the need for a separate comment about its being yearly average power. 

David