[Greenbuilding] Radon
Bruce Donelson
abetterbuilder at frontiernet.net
Wed Jul 4 20:39:54 EDT 2007
OK how big a problem? A smoker, who lives in a house with 20 pC/L of radon
for many years, has a risk of 250 per 1000 of getting lung cancer. That's
pretty bad! The risks go down for nonsmokers, and go down even more for
lower levels of radon. 4 pC/L is the minimum action level, where lung
cancer risks are not much different than where there is no radon.
Any new construction *should* have at least a passive radon reduction system
installed (so-called "radon-ready") and have a radon test after construction
is complete. There are no laws or codes about this, but it is becoming
common to see buyers requiring radon tests. It is a lot easier to build
during construction than to retrofit. I would consider it a vital part of a
Green home.
Some areas of the country have almost no naturally occurring radon. That is
probably why there isn't a nationwide policy for testing. If you live where
there isn't any radon, why test?
Bruce Donelson
A Better builder
More information about the Greenbuilding
mailing list