[Greenbuilding] [BULK] Re: Smoke detectors and EMF

[George J. Nesbitt]

All threats are important, fire has more immediate visible results, 
EMF's and other threats are long term and subtle. You may or may not 
ever face either, but important to address both. Fire would be the 
higher short term priority.


Lawrence Lile wrote:
> I know someone who lost two children in a fire, no smoke detectors installed.  This helps us get our priorities straight - people argue endlessly about whether EMF is even a problem, but there is no doubt that fires kill thousands of people every year.  We often worry a lot about very unlikely problems and become blasé' about problems that lurk everywhere (dying in a car accident or a house fire) 
>
>  
>  
> Lawrence Lile, P.E., LEED AP
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: greenbuilding-bounces at listserv.repp.org [mailto:greenbuilding-bounces at listserv.repp.org] On Behalf Of George J. Nesbitt
> Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2007 3:43 PM
> To: Irina Golfman
> Cc: greenbuilding at listserv.repp.org
> Subject: [BULK] Re: [Greenbuilding] Smoke detectors and EMF
> Importance: Low
>
> I was doing some research on smoke detector last fall and here is some 
> of what I came up with.
>
> *Why* install smoke detector? because they save lives, I 
>
> _______________________________________________
> Greenbuilding email list
> List info: http://listserv.repp.org/mailman/listinfo/greenbuilding_listserv.repp.org
> List email: Greenbuilding at listserv.repp.org
> Managed by BuildingGreen, Inc. http://www.buildinggreen.com
>       publisher of Environmental Building News and GreenSpec(r)
> Hosted and archived by REPP / CREST http://www.crest.org
>
>