[Greenbuilding] PU foam
Rob Tom
ArchiLogic at yahoo.ca
Thu Sep 6 18:54:14 EDT 2007
On Thu, 06 Sep 2007 18:01:45 -0400, Keith Winston
<keith at earthsunenergy.com> wrote:
> for roofs, when doing a non-vented roof assembly, you don't want high
> vapor permeability: you
> want a vapor barrier
>
> Vadurro, Rob, EMNRD wrote:
>> Regarding vapor permeability and PU foam, I mentioned that PU foam was
>> vapor permeable because our local inspectors allow PU roofs to be
>> installed over un-vented roof joist space because they consider the PU
>> vapor permeable enough to not require the additional joist venting.
Moisture transport into the roof assembly via vapour diffusion is seldom
an issue with low-rise residential construction so the vapour permeance of
the pee-you foam should be neither here nor there from the building
inspectors' point of view.
OTOH, bulk moisture transport via air leakage can be an issue and
sprayed-in-place pee-you foam is very good at minimising the potential for
air leakage to occur.
Bottom line: Pee-you foam is effective both as a "vapour barrier" (in
OldSpeak, or "VDR" in technically-correctSpeak)) and as a component of the
air barrier strategy.
--
=== * ===
Rob Tom
Kanata, Ontario, Canada
< A r c h i L o g i c at C h a f f Y a h o o dot C a >
(winnow the chaff from my edress in your reply)
More information about the Greenbuilding
mailing list