[Greenbuilding] Foam vs. wet spray cellulose vs. "flash & batt"

[RONALD CASCIO]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mark Marcoplos" <marcoplos at bellsouth.net>
To: "Doug Horgan" <Doug at bowa.com>; <greenbuilding at listserv.repp.org>
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 7:33 AM
Subject: Re: [Greenbuilding] Foam vs. wet spray cellulose vs. "flash & batt"


> Most bang-for-the-buck is damp-spray insulation. Costs about $100 more per
> 1000 sf  & will pay for itself in a year or two.


That's if you use steady state energy costs for projections.

Anyone want to bet that energy prices are going to stay the same?


Ron Cascio
Chestnut Creek
Design/Build/Consult/Develop
Maryland's Eastern Shore