[Stoves] The other side of airpollution
Kevin Chisholm
kchisholm at ca.inter.net
Mon Feb 5 16:49:03 CST 2007
Dear Andrew
----- Original Message -----
From: "AJH" <list at sylva.icuklive.co.uk>
To: "Discussion of biomass cooking stoves" <stoves at listserv.repp.org>
...del...
>
> The fact is that the standards that we in the developed world use are
> too expensive for the developing world, they reflect our compact with
> our peers that we will look after each other in agreeing to abide by
> certain rules. What is hidden in that agreement is the *need* for
> cheap energy but that's a philosophical point with no place on
> [stoves] which seeks to find solutions for the disadvantaged on an
> already strained planet.
I would suggest that most of the "stove regulations" are implemented for
health and fire safety reasons. We say that we are trying to reduce IAP, yet
we propose conditions for the Third World users that would be intolerable
and unacceptable by our own Standards.
We wonder why our Lab Tests produce "good stoves" yet they fail in the
Field.
Duh.
What do you think would happen if the various stove development agencies
were not paid for work done, but rathewr, for work accepted by the intended
end user?
Kevin
More information about the Stoves
mailing list