[Stoves] The PROTOS Plant Oil Cooker
Crispin Pemberton-Pigott
crispinpigott at gmail.com
Sun May 6 17:15:05 CDT 2007
Dear Friends
I have a principled objection to the following claim:
>BSH presents the capacity, fuel use and emissions for the plant oil cooker
>as follows:
[snip]
>Emissions: ten times lower than with high quality kerosene
Emissions of what? Compared with what?
I have noticed that many, in fact nearly all, publications, articles and
emails written on the subject of comparing whatever stove or fuel is being
discussed, always refers to how polluting/smokey/emissive "paraffin" is.
Jet planes run on paraffin. If a stove is not burning it cleanly it is the
fault of the stove, not the fuel.
Now, how can we understand what the emissions of a BSH stove are? Is this
when compared with a Panda or equivalent? One of the Indian pressure
stoves? Some wick stove with a poor emissions profile?
There are quite a number of really clean-burning paraffin stoves on the
market. My observation is that people promoting ethanol or LPG or natural
gas or vegetable oil like to compare their performance against a stinking
Panda. Well, why not compare them with other stoves in the same price
range? That seems to be a bit more fair.
Sorry for sounding off but we have to be realistic in our claims.
Regards
Crispin
More information about the Stoves
mailing list