[Strawbale] 3-string bales...testing, testing, testing...
Matt Chase
mattchase at canoemail.com
Mon Mar 26 15:39:13 CDT 2007
Hi all
I would speculate that very rarely would you find a situation where
individual straws are breaking (snapping), especially when exposed to
tensile forces, as per some of the testing apparatus suggestions that
have been made. I'm not sure what the relevance or usefulness of
testing individual or bundles of straws in this manner would be.
Generally, other forms of failure are observed, such as whole wall
buckling, excessive deflections, or, in the case of plastered wall
tests, delamination or cracking of the plaster. In these cases, it
would be the overall quality of the bale (density, baling etc.) and
of construction that would govern the structural performance, not so
much the ultimate strength of individual fibres. It would be more
appropriate to test on a larger (more realistic) scale. Consider
this: if testing were done to show that rice straw, for instance, is
stiffer and stronger than other types, when tested fibre by fibre,
would one still choose to build with shoddily manufactured rice bale
or a dense, well-baled, wheat bale? Additionally, I believe the
testing has shown by now that strength of straw bale walls is not
really an issue for one or two storey house-sized buildings: it is
the quality of bales and quality of construction (which will lead to
unacceptable deflection, plaster cracking etc.) that are the most
important structural related issues.
Perhaps a more important goal related to the different species of
straw would be to determine which species are most resistant to
prolonged moisture exposure...
Matthew Chase
Message: 3
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 22:41:39 -0700
From: Chris Green <pojeros at telus.net>
Subject: Re: [Strawbale] 3-string bales...testing, testing, testing...
To: Strawbale at listserv.repp.org
Message-ID: <46075D13.8080409 at telus.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Denise Ohio wrote:
> <snip> I've read quite a bit of the
> testing data and wish I was a zillionaire so all of these ideas
could be
> tested thoroughly across an array of conditions.
One series of tests I would like to see is a comparison of the
strengths
of different types of straw: hemp, rice, wheat, oats, barley, flax,
and
so-on, perhaps in comparison to various fodder species ("hay")
I don't know if that has been done yet.
With hemp in there, the testing would probably have to be done by
engineering students at Waterloo University, Fleming College, or some
such place in Canada or Europe so we don't have to, ahem, bale out
some
college kids in the hemp-free States....
What I envision is some kind of calibrated machine/ gizmo that could
pull on individual straws or bundles of straw until they break. Do
that
a few hundred times and one can come up with an averaged figure on
how
strong the different fibres are.
Or, following the spirit of Rob Tom, a simpler, gizmological free way
to
do this would be to clamp the straw on one end and clamp weights on
the
other, adding more weight until the straws break...that might not be
as
accurate as using a precision micro-calibrated hydraulic modulus of
elasticity stress analyser thingie, but it would cost less.
Leaving more money to put in some students' pockets.
Maybe the straw bale community (us) should think about raising some
funds to conduct this testing. I'll pledge (and mail!) $20 if
someone
wants to organize it.
Cheers,
Chris Green.
Sign up today for your Free E-mail at: http://www.canoe.ca/CanoeMail
More information about the Strawbale
mailing list