[Strawbale] (not) Re: Butt Dust

[John Swearingen]

I would guess because MooseHugger 2-string bales are wimpy--baled by tiny
little machines, and unable to withstand forces larger than an angry moose.

John "Poppy-Eye" Swearingen

On 3/27/07, Rob Tom <ArchiLogic at yahoo.ca> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 14:19:10 -0400, Habib John Gonzalez
> <habibg at netidea.com> wrote:
>
> [incriminating evidence <snipped>]
>
>
> So HabiBro, like, if you're wondering why your ears are burning and if you
> are still BC fog-bound maybe you'd care to 'splain to the SB List why it
> is that you prefer working with big ol' tub-o-lard Murrican three-string
> bales rather than slim/trim 2-string MooseHugger bales ?
>
> (Or so Denise Ohio rumour has it.   See:  Re:3-string bales thread )
>
> With the gazillions of people that the SB List influences, choosing
> three-string bales over 2-string bales as a result of a "Habib Gonzalez
> Recommendation" potentially has the consequences of keeping, oh, 4
> bazillion acres (?) of straw out of the hands of other straw consumers
> like the ethanol producers, straw board manufacturers and livestock owners
> who use it for bedding.
>
> Right ?
>
> Over to you Bro.
>
> === * ===
> Rob Tom
> Kanata, Ontario, Canada
> <A r c h i L o g i c   at  c h a f f y a h o o   dot   c a >
> winnow the chaff from my edress in your reply
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Strawbale mailing list
> Strawbale at listserv.repp.org
> http://listserv.repp.org/mailman/listinfo/strawbale_listserv.repp.org
>



-- 
John Swearingen
Skillful Means, Inc.
Design and Construction
www.skillful-means.com