[Strawbale] Bottom of wall detailing
Rene Dalmeijer
rene.dalmeijer at hetnet.nl
Fri Mar 30 05:31:41 CDT 2007
Jeff, Nick and others,
The weep screed is a nice product ( I would like to have it here in the
Netherlands) but I think not the right thing to apply for external
plaster on SB walls. It is absolutely essential that there is a tight
bond between the plaster (whatever type) to the bottom of the wall. I
have the very strong impression that a weep screed will interfere with
this bond. The intention of the detail in Bruce's book is that the
plaster can rest on something firm to support the plaster. As detailed
in earlier mails in this thread The plaster due to its higher modulus
of elasticity carries the load. If the plaster is unable to do so due
to not being properly supported this is the first location where the
plaster can de-laminate from the strawbale wall. Inducing the primary
failure mechanism for a plastered SB wall. Because the plaster is not
supported by the straw it can now crack much more easily.
A weep screed used for its intended purpose for plasters on a wood
frame backboard is an excellent product. Here the plaster is not
carrying a load. Lifting the plaster away form the wood structure in a
location where it is prone to de-lamination creating a capillary where
water can creep potentially harming the substructure is a very good
idea. Ending plaster in a a wel detailed manner is always good
practice.
Rene
On Mar 29, 2007, at 19:00, strawbale-request at listserv.repp.org wrote:
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 17:46:50 -0700
> From: Jeff Ruppert <jeff at odiseanet.com>
> Subject: Re: [Strawbale] Bottom of wall detailing
>
> Nick,
>
> Sorry for not including this also.
>
> http://www.nilesbldg.com/weepscreed.html
>
> If you want to be closer in compliance with codes, read everything with
> caution! This type of research will only enlighten you, even if it
> does
> not apply to your project.
More information about the Strawbale
mailing list