[Strawbale] (no subject)

[Corwyn]

On Apr 30, 2007, at 15:13, jmagill at silverstar.com wrote:

> "An expensive heating system that's
> purpose is not to heat a house. That sounds about
> right."
>
>
> I think you have that wrong. Ours was not an expensive system.

I'm with Jill.  My woodstove cost $1500 not including chimney.  My 
backup radiant heating system cost $1200 including heat source.  Yes, 
it is not to heat the house (except in unusual circumstances), but 
rather to satisfy the mortgage broker, but I suspect it is one of the 
cheapest means to meet that end.

They can of course be expensive (as can anything), but they don't need 
to be.

Thank You Kindly,

Corwyn


-- 
Corwyn
Kermit didn't know the half of it...
http://www.greenfret.com/
corwyn at greenfret.com