[Strawbale] On moisture
Mark Piepkorn
duckchow at potkettleblack.com
Tue Jan 8 17:35:31 CST 2008
Oldish news with a friendly face.
http://markbrinkley.blogspot.com/2007/07/new-methods-of-handling-humidity.html
Excerpts from the webpage:
- - - - -
How should we Handle Humidity?
...The fact is that a detached house, which can
weigh anything between 50 and 200 tonnes,
depending on size and construction methods (and
that's excluding all the foundations), could be
holding as much as 10 tonnes of bound water
within the walls, floors and roofing, and a lot
more within the fixtures and fittings as well.
What does 10 tonnes of water look like? Due to
the miracle of metricated measurements, 10 tonnes
of water turns out to be 10m3 in volume, about
the size of a small bedroom, or perhaps 70
bathfulls, if you prefer that. It also turns out
to be 10,000 litres, which is the amount of water
a typical household uses in about two weeks, or
around 1500 flushes on a 6-liter low flush toilet...
...The fact that there is over a thousand times
more water bound up inside the building than
there is floating around in its airspace just
doesnt come into the equation, despite the fact
that everyone agrees that moisture levels within
a building are constantly changing. Doesnt it
seem strange that we should spend so much effort
and energy expelling 10 litres of water vapour a
day from our homes, when they are 10,000 litres
of water already sitting in the fabric?
There are alternative water vapour management
strategies out there. The best established one
hails from Germany and it consists of fitting
highly permeable materials to be used as a
reservoir to store moisture, with a view to
letting it be evaporated back inside when
conditions allow. In Germany, it is seen as part
of the Building Biology movement and they regard
the use of humidity-buffering materials as one of
their key principles. Needless to say, they
regard the use of mechanical ventilation as an
anathema. A lot of building scientists regard the
Baubiologists as cranks, but there was some
independent testing of their humidity buffering
principles carried out in Canada in 1997 by Straube and Burnett ...
...They looked at the water vapour permeability
of a whole range of products and estimated the following sorption ratings:
Plasterboard painted with emulsion - score 40
Concrete, unfinished score 90
Brick, natural finish score 110
Softwood, unfinished score 150
Strawbale behind lime plaster score 240
Durisol board behind lime plaster score 250
They reckoned that anything with a score of 50 or
higher would work as a humidity buffer. They also
pointed out that such walls work automatically,
dont break down and require no energy to operate...
- - - - -
Mark Piepkorn
www.potkettleblack.com
Wouldn't this be a wonderful world if insecurity
and desperation made us more attractive?
- Broadcast News
More information about the Strawbale
mailing list